Home / States & Local / State Government / State Court Systems
States & Local  · State Government

State Court Systems

ESSistemas judiciales estatales
The fifty state judiciaries, which handle the vast majority of American court cases and choose judges by election, appointment, or merit selection

State courts hear the great majority of cases filed in the United States, including most criminal prosecutions, traffic cases, family and divorce matters, contract and injury suits, probate, and landlord-tenant disputes, tens of millions of cases each year compared with a few hundred thousand in federal court. Most states have three levels: trial courts, often divided into courts of limited and general jurisdiction, intermediate appellate courts, which most states have, and a court of last resort, usually called the supreme court. New York's highest court is the Court of Appeals, and Texas and Oklahoma have separate highest courts for criminal cases.

States choose judges in several ways. Some hold partisan elections, others nonpartisan elections, and others use merit selection, the Missouri Plan adopted in 1940, in which a commission nominates candidates, the governor appoints one, and the judge later faces a yes-or-no retention vote. A few states let the governor or legislature appoint judges. Most state judges face voters at some point, unlike federal judges with life tenure. Judicial election spending has grown sharply, and a 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court race became the most expensive in American history.

State supreme courts have the final word on state law and state constitutions, and the U.S. Supreme Court will not review their decisions when they rest on adequate and independent state grounds, a principle reaffirmed in Michigan v. Long in 1983. In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal in 2009, the Supreme Court held that due process required a West Virginia justice to step aside from a case involving a major campaign donor. Supporters of judicial elections say they make judges accountable, while critics say campaigns and fundraising threaten impartiality.

New Deal & the Administrative State · The Contemporary Era
Timeline
November 5, 1940
Missouri Plan adopted
Merit selection of judges approved by voters.
July 6, 1983
Michigan v. Long
Adequate and independent state grounds rule.
June 8, 2009
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal
Due process requires recusal.
April 1, 2025
Record judicial election
Wisconsin Supreme Court race sets a spending record.
Profile
StatusActive
Legal basisState constitutions and statutes
Official sitencsc.org
Key Facts
Share of U.S. cases The vast majority
Typical levels Trial, intermediate appellate, court of last resort
Two highest courts Texas and Oklahoma
Merit selection Missouri Plan (1940)
Federal review limit Adequate and independent state grounds
Recusal case Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal (2009)
At a Glance
Date State courts since the founding
Facts last checked October 24, 2026. Report a correction